Skip to content
HEARTWISEFOUNDATION
Youth research & policy

HeartWise Observatory.

Canada pilot · Understand and ACT published

The HeartWise Observatory is a youth-focused research and knowledge hub dedicated to understanding the heart-health experiences, needs, and challenges of young people. By collecting community insights, sharing accessible research, and highlighting important trends, the Observatory helps turn evidence into stronger education, advocacy, and future HeartWise initiatives.

Canada
Pilot jurisdiction
2 reports
Understand + ACT · 2026
Aug 31, 2026
Evidence cutoff
4 priorities
Named in ACT
About

Track. Understand. Act.

Three connected parts — data, research, and policy. Nothing here is invented, every number carries its source, and where the evidence runs out, the Observatory says so.

Youth-focused, youth-led

Research framed around the heart-health experiences, needs, and challenges of young people — and driven by them.

Verified, always

The first phase draws only on existing published data from trusted public sources, cited every time.

Built to expand

Canada is the pilot jurisdiction; the focus can move to a new country without rebuilding a thing.

Track

Three things worth knowing.

Two pictures and one game from the 2026 report, each doing one job. Every one carries the report’s own source and limitation — the Observatory never shows a number without them.

Explore 01

Still seen by a cardiologist?

100 children born with congenital heart disease in Quebec in 1983. Drag the age from birth to 18; the slider only stops where the study measured.

At the start, all 100 in cardiology follow-up.

Show as a table
By birthdayNo cardiology follow-upStill followed
6th28%72%
13th47%53%
18th61%39%
18th, most severe lesions only21%79%

“Tracking that cohort forward, researchers found that 28 percent had not received cardiology follow-up by their sixth birthday, 47 percent by their thirteenth, and 61 percent by their eighteenth. Even among those with the most severe lesions, the group for whom ongoing cardiology follow-up matters most, only 79 percent had been seen by a cardiologist after turning 18.”

Source & limitation

Source Understand: Canada 2026, Investigation 05 (Reference 19: Mackie et al., Children and adults with congenital heart disease lost to follow-up: who and when? Circulation 2009;120:302–309).

Important limitation The evidence is also old and geographically narrow: the cohort was born in 1983 and tracked using data available up to roughly 2005, it describes Quebec rather than Canada as a whole, and cardiac care, transition programming, and health system navigation have all changed since then. It should be read as strong evidence that this kind of discontinuity can and did happen in a well-documented Canadian population, not as a current national prevalence figure.

Explore 02

When a heart stops outside a hospital

The national number every school AED sits inside — Canadians of all ages, which the report is explicit is context, not a youth statistic.

All ages · Canada · not a youth statistic

Heart & Stroke, 2024 · Reference 23

That is one every nine minutes. In Heart & Stroke’s words: “Doing CPR and using an AED can double a person’s chance of survival.”

Source & limitation

Source Understand: Canada 2026, Investigation 06 (Reference 23: Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, Every Second Counts: Transforming Resuscitation to Restart More Hearts, 2024).

Important limitation This figure describes all ages and is used here strictly as national context, not as a youth statistic. An earlier, commonly cited estimate of roughly 40,000 annual events appears to reflect, at least in part, changes over time in how these events are counted and reported, rather than a true increase in how often cardiac arrest occurs; nothing in the evidence reviewed here supports treating the difference between the two figures as a genuine rise in incidence.

Explore 03

Find the AED

Canada cannot say how many of its schools have a working, accessible AED (Data Gap 06). Steer the heart through this 8-bit school and find the one here before the clock runs out.

Find the AED

You have 60 seconds. Where’s the AED?

Steer the heart with the arrow keys or WASD — on a phone, use the on-screen pad. The clue at the top runs from Freezing to Scorching as you get closer. Walk into the AED to find it.

Source & limitation

Source Understand: Canada 2026, Investigation 06 and Data Gap 06 (References 24–28). Cardiac-arrest figures on the ending screen: Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, 2024 — all ages, Canada; only the 60,000 and 1 in 10 figures appear in the report (Reference 23).

Important limitation Data Gap 06: “Provincial and territorial policy statements, legislation, and funding program descriptions, addressed in Investigation 6, but this review did not identify a consolidated dataset confirming actual on-the-ground implementation.” The school here is a cartoon, not a real building, and the four AED spots are typical placements drawn from school cardiac-emergency guidance (Project ADAM, American Heart Association), not a Canadian requirement.

Understand

The research report.

Seven investigations, six findings that survived the evidence test, and a register of what Canada cannot yet see — written to be read by anyone, not just researchers.

Published

Understand: Canada 2026 · First edition, pilot report

What Canada knows, and does not yet know, about the cardiovascular health of its young people.

35 pages · Evidence cutoff August 31, 2026. Read it in the HeartWise reader, or download the PDF.

Canadian cardiac emergency readiness policy, by jurisdiction

The matrix from Investigation 6: what each province and territory has formally committed to on public-access AEDs and school CPR/AED curriculum — not what is in place on the ground.

Categorical status only. PRESENT indicates confirmed legislation, regulation, or official mandate; PARTIAL indicates a funding program, non-binding policy, or requirement covering only part of the relevant schools or age range; NOT IDENTIFIED indicates that no clear, current, official source could be located, which reflects a limit of this review’s search rather than confirmation that no policy exists; UNCLEAR indicates conflicting or ambiguous information. Each of Canada’s thirteen provinces and territories is listed separately; none are grouped. This matrix reflects the most recent identified official source as of the evidence cutoff of August 31, 2026, and should be independently reverified before any operational use. No numerical score or provincial ranking is implied or provided, and a PRESENT rating describes a formal policy requirement only, not confirmed on-the-ground implementation.

JurisdictionPublic-access AED policySchool AED / CPR-AED curriculum
British Columbia
Evidence confidence: partial

ministerial order and ministry policy, not standalone legislation; secondary school target date passed, elementary/middle target not yet due as of evidence cutoff ref. 27

Evidence confidence: present

mandatory Grade 10 curriculum component ref. 27

Alberta
Evidence confidence: unclear

indications of a public-access defibrillation funding program, but no citable, current official source

Evidence confidence: unclear
Saskatchewan
Evidence confidence: unclear
Evidence confidence: unclear

indications of a school-focused cardiac-readiness initiative, but no citable, current official source

Manitoba
Evidence confidence: present

Defibrillator Public Access Act ref. 24

Evidence confidence: partial

schools among designated public locations ref. 24

Ontario
Evidence confidence: partial

Defibrillator Registration and Public Access Act enacted; staged implementation ref. 25

Evidence confidence: unclear
Quebec
Evidence confidence: not identified

no public-access legislation located

Evidence confidence: unclear

indications of a school AED installation initiative, but no citable, current official source

New Brunswick
Evidence confidence: not identified
Evidence confidence: not identified
Nova Scotia
Evidence confidence: present

Defibrillators Act ref. 26

Evidence confidence: unclear

indications of school AED funding, but no citable, current official source

Prince Edward Island
Evidence confidence: not identified

no public-access legislation located

Evidence confidence: present

mandatory secondary curriculum component ref. 28

Newfoundland and Labrador
Evidence confidence: not identified
Evidence confidence: not identified
Yukon
Evidence confidence: not identified
Evidence confidence: not identified
Northwest Territories
Evidence confidence: not identified
Evidence confidence: not identified
Nunavut
Evidence confidence: not identified
Evidence confidence: not identified

Not a scorecard. Categorical status only — reverify against current official sources before any operational use.

Act

The policy report.

Four headline policy priorities: two ACT NOW and two BUILD THE CONDITIONS. Each one asks an institution that already has real authority in this space to do something specific and measurable.

Published

ACT — Canada 2026 · A policy companion to UNDERSTAND

From Evidence to Action: Policy Directions for Youth Cardiovascular Health in Canada

25 pages · Policy status verified September 6, 2026. Read it in the HeartWise reader, or download the PDF.

  1. 01Evidence confidence: Status: act now

    A current view of youth cardiovascular health

    Assess the feasibility of a recurring youth cardiovascular reporting framework

    Who can act
    Public Health Agency of Canada; Statistics Canada
    Action
    Assess feasibility of a recurring youth-specific reporting framework using existing data sources.
    Read Priority 01
  2. 02Evidence confidence: Status: act now

    Measure whether CHD transition actually happens

    Develop a nationally consistent measure of pediatric-to-adult congenital cardiac transfer

    Who can act
    Canadian Adult Congenital Heart Network; Canadian Cardiovascular Society
    Action
    Develop a nationally consistent transition/transfer measure.
    Read Priority 02
  3. 03Evidence confidence: Status: build the conditions

    Make specialty access comparable

    Develop a common definition and pilot comparable reporting before considering a benchmark

    Who can act
    Canadian Institute for Health Information; cardiology and pediatric cardiology bodies; provincial/territorial partners
    Action
    Common definition and pilot reporting for referral-to-assessment time; benchmark only later.
    Read Priority 03
  4. 04Evidence confidence: Status: build the conditions

    Verify school cardiac-emergency implementation

    Verify and report implementation, without treating policy adoption as proof of readiness

    Who can act
    Relevant ministry or school-system authority in each jurisdiction with a requirement
    Action
    Transparent verification and reporting of implementation, not just policy presence.
    Read Priority 04

Not a headline priority: Indigenous youth cardiovascular measurement (governed by the HeartWise Governance Commitment) and pan-Canadian congenital heart disease data infrastructure (tracked on the System-Building Watchlist).

Where ACT does not recommend policy change

Restraint is not a gap in this document. It is a deliberate output of applying the same evidentiary standard to plausible-sounding ideas that ACT applies to the recommendations it does make.

Universal ECG screening of Canadian youth
UNDERSTAND’s Observatory Finding 02 found that Canadian cardiology guidance considered and declined blanket ECG screening even for the narrower population of competitive athletes, based on concerns about false positives and the absence of evidence that expanded screening reduces population-level sudden cardiac death. Extending screening to the general youth population has even less evidentiary support in this review.
Mandatory blanket ECG screening of student athletes
This is the specific policy UNDERSTAND’s Finding 02 addresses directly. Canadian guidance already considered this approach and adopted a tiered history-and-physical model instead. The international debate between that approach and first-line ECG screening remains genuinely unresolved, not settled in either direction, and ACT does not attempt to settle it here.
Provincial cardiac-readiness rankings
UNDERSTAND explicitly declined to construct a numerical ranking of provinces because the underlying data are not comparable: legislation, funding, implementation deadlines, and verified on-the-ground readiness are four different things, and most jurisdictions have reliable evidence for only the first two or three. Producing a ranking now would manufacture a precision the evidence does not support.
Treating jurisdictions rated NOT IDENTIFIED as unprepared
UNDERSTAND was explicit that a NOT IDENTIFIED rating reflects the limits of that review’s own search, not a finding that no policy exists. Several jurisdictions, including the three territories and Newfoundland and Labrador, fall into this category, and their absence from UNDERSTAND’s search results should not be read as evidence of anything about their actual readiness.
A single national youth sudden-cardiac-arrest rate
UNDERSTAND’s Data Gap 05 is explicit that the review did not identify a youth-specific national rate. Available Canadian evidence either spans an age range extending well past what most people mean by youth or has a mean age in the late fifties. Neither isolates a youth-specific figure, and no combination of these sources should be presented as one.
HeartWise-designed Indigenous cardiovascular targets or interventions
This is addressed fully in the HeartWise Governance Commitment. UNDERSTAND is explicit that this is not a task for HeartWise to define unilaterally, and ACT treats that as a binding constraint on its own recommendations, not a gap to be filled elsewhere in this section.
Broad claims that geography produces inequitable cardiac care for all Canadian youth
UNDERSTAND’s geographic finding concerns a specific population, infants with moderate-complexity congenital heart disease requiring intervention in the first year of life, in a study that excluded Quebec. UNDERSTAND explicitly declined to generalize this finding to describe geographic inequity across all Canadian youth cardiovascular care, and ACT preserves that boundary.

Partner with the Observatory.

Researchers, clinicians, health authorities, sponsors, and media: the 2027 edition’s research priorities are already named. Help answer them.